OBT Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OurBattleTech.com - A BattleTech Fan Site

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Down

Author Topic: ComGuard Force Composition  (Read 11887 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Takiro

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,175
  • For the Last Cameron!
ComGuard Force Composition
« on: February 21, 2012, 09:52:40 AM »

Hey guys, i want to start a conversation about ComGuard Force Composition cause I just don't understand. If you look at the organizational chart in FM ComStar you would think that every greek letter formation should be divisible by 6. Yet every divisional layout has39 not 36 aerospace fighters. Why aren't infantry squads in a Level I a 6 man team? Insstead the platoon is level 1 not a 2? Wtf?
Logged

MadCapellan

  • Warlock Fusiliers
  • Hexare Grenadier
  • Kapten
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 382
  • Louise & Saito: Love Forever!
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2012, 10:11:57 AM »

The Aero-triple thing has always been troublesome for a lot of people.  Probably the best use of it would be to tie it to three artillery platforms as a form of flexible support Level II. 

The Level I infantry platoon, however, makes plenty of sense in my mind.  There's very little value in treating a conventional infantry platoon as a BattleMech or vehicle lance equivalent when it brings nothing equivalent to the field in terms of performance.  At least six well-equipped infantry platoons could be considered the equal of a lance of light tanks....
Logged

Halvagor

  • Fanjunkare
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 207
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2012, 01:27:43 PM »

For the ASF, it's pretty much that some people aren't very good at math. 

For the platoon, the truth of it seems to be that infantry squads aren't BattleTech playable units.  Battle Armor, yes, those can go in a squad, and traditionally tanks (though not APCs) have individually been treated like a "squad" in vehicle units.  If BT allowed infantry to have disposable one-shot ATGMs or MANPADs, basing the Level I infantry on a squad could work.  As it is, a squad (especially a squad of 7 men, smaller even than the US Army's diminutive 9-man squads) is just too paltry a force to count, and even 28-man infantry platoons are often considered next to worthless (which is why I arm them almost exclusively with Inferno SRMs). 
Logged
"...but if evil men were not now and then slain it would not be a good world for weaponless dreamers."  From Kim, by Rudyard Kipling, 1901

masterarminas

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,515
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2012, 04:28:34 PM »

I have always had a problem with the multitude of different ComGuard formations.  Twenty-four distinct types of Level IV formations?  What the . . . ?

How about we simply the ComGuards?  I'll work on this.

Master Arminas
Logged

masterarminas

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,515
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2012, 04:41:25 PM »

Perhaps this, with three Level IV formation organizations (Light, Standard, Heavy)

Level IV (Standard)

BattleMech Level III:  36 'Mechs
BattleMech Level III:  36 'Mechs
Combat Vehicle Level III:  36 armored combat vehicles
Aerospace Fighter Level III:  36 Aerospace Fighters
Mechanized Infantry Level III:  18 armored combat vehicles AND 504 conventional infantry or 72 Battle Armor
Mechanized Infantry Level III:  18 armored combat vehicles AND 504 conventional infantry or 72 Battle Armor

Totals:  72 BattleMechs; 72 armored combat vehicles; 36 aerospace fighters; and either 1,008 conventional infantry or 144 Battle Armor


Level IV (Heavy)

BattleMech Level III:  36 'Mechs
BattleMech Level III:  36 'Mechs
BattleMech Level III:  36 'Mechs
Combat Vehicle Level III:  36 armored combat vehicles
Aerospace Fighter Level III:  36 Aerospace Fighters
Mechanized Infantry Level III:  18 armored combat vehicles AND 504 conventional infantry or 72 Battle Armor

Totals:  108 BattleMechs; 54 armored combat vehicles; 36 aerospace fighters; and either 504 conventional infantry or 72 Battle Armor


Level IV (Light)

BattleMech Level III:  36 'Mechs
Combat vehicle Level III:  36 armored combat vehicles
Combat Vehicle Level III:  36 armored combat vehicles
Aerospace Fighter Level III:  36 Aerospace Fighters
Mechanized Infantry Level III:  18 armored combat vehicles AND 504 conventional infantry or 72 Battle Armor
Mechanized Infantry Level III:  18 armored combat vehicles AND 504 conventional infantry or 72 Battle Armor

Totals:  36 BattleMechs; 108 armored combat vehicles; 36 aerospace fighters; and either 1,008 conventional infantry or 144 Battle Armor

Thoughts?

Master Arminas
« Last Edit: February 21, 2012, 07:23:30 PM by masterarminas »
Logged

MadCapellan

  • Warlock Fusiliers
  • Hexare Grenadier
  • Kapten
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 382
  • Louise & Saito: Love Forever!
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2012, 04:51:39 PM »

Naaah, I prefer my esoteric and nonsensical religious order Comguards, but thanks!
Logged

Blacknova

  • Puppet Master
  • Global Moderator
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Rugby Players - Inspiration for the BattleMech
    • The Kapteyn Universe
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2012, 07:17:28 PM »

I like it.  I reorganised the CG in the Kapteyn Universe as tracking them in the spread sheets was a nightmare.
Logged
Dedicated to committing viciously gratuitous bastardy of the first order.

The Kapteyn Universe - http://www.ourbattletech.com/kapteyn

Follow the KU on twitter: Matt Alexander
@BlackNova01

You know there is something wrong with the FWL, when Word's spell check changes Impavido to Impetigo and Zechetinu to Secretion.

Takiro

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,175
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2012, 07:29:26 PM »

Gathering my thoughts please stand bye.  ;)
Logged

Halvagor

  • Fanjunkare
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 207
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2012, 10:04:22 PM »

The total numbers I'm fine with; the homogenous Level IIIs I don't like.  Since the ComGuards are said to take combined-arms down to a smaller level than any other major military, I'd prefer something like this:

Level IV (Standard)

6x Level III: 12 'Mechs, 12 Armored Vehicles, 6 ASF, 6 Infantry platoons/BA squads


Level IV (Heavy)

6x Level III: 18 'Mechs, 9 armored vehicles, 6 ASF, 3 infantry platoons/BA squads


Level IV (Light)

6x Level III: 6 'Mechs, 18 armored vehicles, 6 ASF, 6 Infantry platoons/BA squads


These would, however, be standards, with considerable variation, allowing the ComGuards to better customize a unit to the needs.  When the ComGuards were "merely" a garrison force, for example, armored vehicles and infantry would see a higher proportion; as they reworked themselves as a field force to fight the Clans, you'd see a greater proportion of 'mechs.
Logged
"...but if evil men were not now and then slain it would not be a good world for weaponless dreamers."  From Kim, by Rudyard Kipling, 1901

Blacknova

  • Puppet Master
  • Global Moderator
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Rugby Players - Inspiration for the BattleMech
    • The Kapteyn Universe
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2012, 11:23:31 PM »

I thing I don't like about the ComGuards is the base six aproach.  It is easier to have a base 5 organisation, from a field commanders perspective, or have 2 base 3 formations in stead of the 6.
Logged
Dedicated to committing viciously gratuitous bastardy of the first order.

The Kapteyn Universe - http://www.ourbattletech.com/kapteyn

Follow the KU on twitter: Matt Alexander
@BlackNova01

You know there is something wrong with the FWL, when Word's spell check changes Impavido to Impetigo and Zechetinu to Secretion.

Takiro

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,175
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #10 on: February 21, 2012, 11:32:27 PM »

That is a great point Halvagor. You do hear about the ComGuards utilizing combined arms in a more extensive way than any other InnerSphere military. However I have never seen anything about mixed Level IIs or Level IIIs. It might be interesting to have a Level II of 4 Mechs and 2 Fighters (a half company of raiders ideally deployed in a Leopard class Dropship) or a Level III of 12 Mechs, 12 Vehicles, and 12 Infantry (2 Level IIs each). Be interesting but instead you get the monolithic Battalions that make up a Combined Arms Division.

Still working up my revised ComGuard compositions which you will see in Clarion Call. I wanted to ask your opinion on a new formation I call the Apex. Composed of 5 BattleMech Battalions (180), 1 Aerospace Fighter Wing (30), and 1 Infantry Half Company (6 platoons) it is the ultimate ComStar assault force. This isn't very combined arms I grant you but such a force would pack the greatest battlefield punch. Efficiently deployed by 5 Overlord Dropships which plays well if operating in Battalion sized taskforces or one giant sledgehammer. While the Mech force is the primary strike force of this powerful formation it is ably supported by fighters who are tasked with ground support. The Infantry force while the smallest would likely be special or elite forces (Battlearmor) who could be used to perform select operations in support of their Mech brethren. Vehicles are dropped completely from this premier front line force.

My revised Alpha formation adds 4 Mechs (168 BattleMechs) and 2 Vehicles (6 Vehicles) while dropping 3 Infantry (6 platoons) and 3 Fighters (36 Fighters). This rounds out the Battalions of this unit nicely giving you Level IIs of Vehicles and Infantry. A Level III of Aerospace Fighters with 4 Battalions and 1 Company of BattleMechs. However I could shrink the Mech complement further by taking that company of Mechs and splitting it into Vehicles and Infantry. That would be 4 Mech Battalions (144), 1 Vehicle Company (12 Vehicles), 1 Infantry Company (12 Platoons), and 1 Fighter Battalion (36). What do you think?
Logged

masterarminas

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,515
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #11 on: February 21, 2012, 11:43:57 PM »

Halvagor, that's fine.  I was using the Level IIIs as a simple way to show what the Level IV contains, but I do think your adaptation down to the Level III combined arms level works good.  And it is still small enough that you can mod an Overlord to carry a single Level III, light, standard, or heavy.  I like it.

Master Arminas
Logged

MadCapellan

  • Warlock Fusiliers
  • Hexare Grenadier
  • Kapten
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 382
  • Louise & Saito: Love Forever!
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #12 on: February 22, 2012, 09:07:07 AM »

That is a great point Halvagor. You do hear about the ComGuards utilizing combined arms in a more extensive way than any other InnerSphere military. However I have never seen anything about mixed Level IIs or Level IIIs.

Look at a lot of forces written for scenarios.  They include a lot of examples of mixed 'Mech/tank/infantry Level IIs.
Logged

Knightmare

  • Terran Supremacist
  • Network Gnome
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,459
  • Taking out the Sphere's trash since 3026
    • Our BattleTech
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #13 on: February 22, 2012, 09:08:06 AM »

Naaah, I prefer my esoteric and nonsensical religious order Comguards, but thanks!

+1
Logged
Quote from: Dragon Cat
WORD (of Blake) is good for two things. 1. Leaving inappropriate notes on other people's work. 2. Adding fake words (of Blake) to the dictionary.

Halvagor

  • Fanjunkare
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 207
Re: ComGuard Force Composition
« Reply #14 on: February 22, 2012, 12:43:02 PM »

That is a great point Halvagor. You do hear about the ComGuards utilizing combined arms in a more extensive way than any other InnerSphere military. However I have never seen anything about mixed Level IIs or Level IIIs. It might be interesting to have a Level II of 4 Mechs and 2 Fighters (a half company of raiders ideally deployed in a Leopard class Dropship) or a Level III of 12 Mechs, 12 Vehicles, and 12 Infantry (2 Level IIs each). Be interesting but instead you get the monolithic Battalions that make up a Combined Arms Division.
The combined-arms integration within Level IIs may not be explicitly stated, but is directly implied by the composition chart on page 9 of FASA 1714: Field Manual: ComStar.  Only 6 of the 24 types of formation (Delta, Epsilon, Zeta, Rho, Sigma, Tau) have BattleMech forces divisible evenly by 6.  Therefore, in 18/24 styles of division there is at least one Level II which is of mixed unit types.  Most will have at least two Level IIs of mixed models.  And, as MadCapellan pointed out, a lot of published scenarios assume a mixed-unit Level II.

Still working up my revised ComGuard compositions which you will see in Clarion Call. I wanted to ask your opinion on a new formation I call the Apex. Composed of 5 BattleMech Battalions (180), 1 Aerospace Fighter Wing (30), and 1 Infantry Half Company (6 platoons) it is the ultimate ComStar assault force. This isn't very combined arms I grant you but such a force would pack the greatest battlefield punch. Efficiently deployed by 5 Overlord Dropships which plays well if operating in Battalion sized taskforces or one giant sledgehammer. While the Mech force is the primary strike force of this powerful formation it is ably supported by fighters who are tasked with ground support. The Infantry force while the smallest would likely be special or elite forces (Battlearmor) who could be used to perform select operations in support of their Mech brethren. Vehicles are dropped completely from this premier front line force.
I think the value of massed battlemechs is overstated.  While it's rare for a lance of armor to overcome a lance of battlemechs in a straight-up fight, my experience with regiment-on-regiment MegaMek battles indicates that two battalions of medium-heavy 'mechs with two battalions of medium armor can defeat three battalions of heavy-assault 'mechs without too much of a stretch. 

Early sourcebooks bore this out, as well, especially in the writeups of the Fourth War, where it was often said that it was the FedSuns' RCT combined-arms teams which allowed them to win fights, not just their better strategic planning.  As late as the publication of Bush Wars the Defenders of Andurien's combined-arms loadout (which was never specified) is listed as one of the reasons for their success in Andurien's bid for independence (and lack of it is cited as one of several reasons the Canopians performed so poorly). 

But through most of the Clan War all anyone talked about was 'mechs, 'mechs, 'mechs -- during the Blood of Kerensky series only twice do vehicles play any significant role in battles described, at Wolcott (where the Kuritans curb-stomped the Clanners good) and with the ComGuard -- but on Tukayyid the heavy armor Level II butchered by Phelan's light recon star was 1) stupid 2) all heavy vehicles and 3) not supported at all by anything else.  I tend to think that a single standard FedCom RCT should, by itself, eat your average Clan Galaxy for breakfast -- especially if bidding is involved on the Clanner side.  Because 3 regiments of armor should have a say in the fight, rather than being ignored completely as happened in just about every description of a Clan engagement with an RCT.

I think your Apex formation would still lose in a fight against a decent FedCom RCT, which makes up for only having 66% of your 'mechs by fielding 324+ armored vehicles, and a battalion of artillery (forget the Poor Bloody Infantry, though I suspect the RCT could defeat your Apex without its 'mechs at all); you're even on fighters.

But the Apex could probably give a Clan galaxy a straight-up fight. 

Quote from: Takiro
My revised Alpha formation adds 4 Mechs (168 BattleMechs) and 2 Vehicles (6 Vehicles) while dropping 3 Infantry (6 platoons) and 3 Fighters (36 Fighters). This rounds out the Battalions of this unit nicely giving you Level IIs of Vehicles and Infantry. A Level III of Aerospace Fighters with 4 Battalions and 1 Company of BattleMechs. However I could shrink the Mech complement further by taking that company of Mechs and splitting it into Vehicles and Infantry. That would be 4 Mech Battalions (144), 1 Vehicle Company (12 Vehicles), 1 Infantry Company (12 Platoons), and 1 Fighter Battalion (36). What do you think?

My honest assessment is that you'd be better off with 4 vehicles & 8 infantry, provided one of the vehicles is a Mobile HQ.  If not, then I'd just do 12 Infantry, because then at least there's someone to guard the techs at all times and the 'mechs at night when the pilots are sleeping.  6 vehicles, unless one is a specialized command unit like a Mobile HQ, aren't going to add anything to the fight; 12 infantry can at least guard the supplies from thieves.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2012, 12:53:01 PM by Halvagor »
Logged
"...but if evil men were not now and then slain it would not be a good world for weaponless dreamers."  From Kim, by Rudyard Kipling, 1901
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Up