But I think the Uprisings were different from the RW- During the Uprisings I think the SLDF had a much larger numerical advantage over the Periphery forces. I agree that the will to fight is important, but I also think the governments of the Periphery states (especially the TC and the MOC) were playing a risky game- remember the TC did not succeed from the Star League- only some of the member worlds did. I would argue that the periphery leaders hoped they would badly bloody the SLDF, which they did and the SL would then leave the periphery as not being worth the trouble. Instead General Kerensky initially retreated and then came back with a vengeance to put down the rebellion. Had the war lasted much longer I suspect the rebels would have gone to ground (supported by their governments) and prepared for the next Uprising.
The Uprising was definitely a risky proposition but I think you're underestimating the resolve of the Periphery or the type of game they playing. I tend to view the Periphery Uprising as the opening stages of a possible war of independence for the Periphery realms. It makes sense that the Periphery governments wouldn't openly rebel. Their leaders would want to gauge the SLDF's/Star League's response (because they're two different things) before committing themselves to a specific course of action and of course to bloody the nose of the SLDF a bit with minimized risk.
Now assuming for a second the Coup did not occur it's very possible that another "Sparks of Santiago," engineered or otherwise was in the works. All it takes is a minor screw up and the whole Periphery goes up in flames, or at least a good portion of it. And I don't believe the rebels would have "gone to ground" quietly. I just think the periphery would suffer another wave of terrorist attacks while they regrouped their physical strength. Remember, the only reason why the SLDF was even remotely successful the first time around is because Amaris sold the TFA out. Which on a side note, doubly helped the Star League because the SAS's methods were becoming so brutal they would have likely been the spark responsible for setting the whole Concordat ablaze.
I agree the Rebels were incredibly successful- but I think by 2767 they were were in bad shape- many units had been destroyed and there were no reserves. The SLDF on the other had still had huge numbers of troops who had not been committed to the war, could in theory call on the support of the Great Houses and had a large training system that was turning out large numbers of troops. I think the Periphery forces had used up the element of surprise and the Uprising had turned into a war of attrition, which the rebels had no hope of winning. Yes the rebels would fight for as long as they could but I don't think it would be that long...
Personally I think you're looking at this too linearly, but that's just my opinion. By 2767 the rebels weren't better armed than their Reunification War ancestors and they managed to bloody the League for over a decade. The problem, or rather the strength of the rebels here is that they have the tacit approval of their governments. The SLDF has to be careful in rooting them out, as opposed to conducting the same type of total war campaign it did during the RW - that's playing with super dangerous fire. So the rebels won't be fighting pitched standard battles, they'll just go back to another round of terrorism while they rebuild or setup the next "phase" of the rebellion. I don't think they'd simply stop. I think this was just the beginning.
You also have to wonder if the Great Houses would support a war to reclaim the Periphery...
I mean by 2767 the House leaders were already teetering on the edge of washing their hands of the Star League altogether. In their eyes the League had served its purpose, now it was beginning to become troublesome. The House Lords were also more or less done raping the periphery, so you have to wonder if another possible Reunification War was on the horizon would that have been the straw that broke the Star League's back and not the Coup?
I mean you know Richard II, who was incredibly unpopular with the High Council would have pitched a fit if the periphery realms ceded from the League and would demand its reconquest. The House Lords, who really don't give a damn would just wait for poor Richard to pull some illegal nonsense so they could withdrawal their support from any military endeavor, or just drag their knuckles getting anything done (why destroy the military gains you've just spent a decade rebuilding for a League you
USE, but not really believe in?) all while the SLDF bleeds to death for lack of support. At that point the SLDF ceases to be as scary as it once was and the House leaders simply dissolve their involvement in the Star League since it no longer works for them, nor does it unite all the disparate peoples of the Inner Sphere under one flag, blah, blah, blah and so on, just fast forward to 2781. Richard II is likely to be deposed or forcibly removed at some point because I can almost guarantee he's going to have a mental breakdown worse than Johnathan's. You'll probably end up with Kerensky as Regent until Cameron's daughter is old enough to take the Hegemony throne.
Welcome Age of War II, but with a fully stocked Terran Hegemony.
![Grin ;D](https://obtforum.com/forum/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
But did they ability to move the supplies and troops simultaneously? I'm not sure the SLDF could redeploy most of it's divisions and enough supplies to support them for 2 years in the field at the same time.
I'm thinking so. They didn't give those tin-can WarShips of theirs ridiculous cargo-carrying capacity's for nothing.
![Cheesy :D](https://obtforum.com/forum/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
Besides, it's an on-going effort. Just means Kerensky's move into the Periphery would have taken a little bit longer as he spent more time preparing.
I would tend to limit the TR3050 refits to weapons, heatsinks and the like- unless these "refits" are new production from a factory they should not have any structural improvements (Case, Endo Steel, Ferro-Fibrous Armor, XL Engines). And as a note, the TR3050 mechs typically used more L2 tech the TR2750 mechs, but they also used it poorly (reflecting the designers lack of experience with the new equipment).
I would remove Ferro-Fibrous Armor and maybe CASE from that list. Since Ferror-Fibrous armor is an external application that could probably be refitted without too much trouble. For gaming purposes we use internal crits, but in reality it would just be a question of recognizing the bulk difference to determine weight and volume before application. As for CASE, I know it's a two part system (the actual ammunition box/escape hatch and the software) and that for some BattleMech models, retro-fitting CASE could be accomplished rather easily while it's waiting for a new skin of Ferro-Fibrous armor. However, I would council restraint when using CASE (if using it at all) because of the structural work involved in any installation more difficult than the Enforcer's AC/10 setup. You know, "load a clip in the rear and you're finished" kind of setup.