OBT Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

AU Developers - Please PM Knightmare or MechRat if you need board or permission changes

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: Quicksilver Decisions  (Read 38003 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JPArbiter

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,725
  • Host of Arbitration. Your last word in Battletech
Re: Quicksilver Decisions
« Reply #45 on: July 22, 2014, 10:08:19 PM »
you know what.  Consider them competitors to the fan produced designs.
Logged
BattleTech products aren't Pokemon Cards. You don't have to catch, or collect them all.

WHAT NO ONE EVER TOLD ME THAT!

Takiro

  • Moderator
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,193
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: Quicksilver Decisions
« Reply #46 on: July 22, 2014, 10:52:38 PM »
Interesting idea, sets a bar certainly. I do like it.

Would their age necessity a small redesign for elemental carrying or just leave them altogether the same?
Logged

masterarminas

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,515
Re: Quicksilver Decisions
« Reply #47 on: July 22, 2014, 11:26:49 PM »
Might I humbly suggest . . .

As It Should Have Been?

:)

MA

Logged

drakensis

  • Duke of Avalon
  • KU Player
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,299
Re: Quicksilver Decisions
« Reply #48 on: July 23, 2014, 01:04:34 AM »
I'm very fond of both machines so I vote to re-activate them.
Logged

Abele

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,093
  • A Man in a Tin Suit
Re: Quicksilver Decisions
« Reply #49 on: July 23, 2014, 01:46:19 AM »
I am of mixed mind as I already have designed my zombies for both the 60 and 75 ton classes. I would have to check them against the Lupus and the Woodsman before I choose what to vote. Give me 8 or 9 hours to finish work and get home.
Logged
The Honor of Men cannot be bound by the words of Fools- Marco Hietala
I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. - Confucius
May God defend me from my friends; I can defend myself from my enemies. - Voltaire
Chaos doesn't need a recipe, just a list of ingredients. - Drakensis
Kachi ni Fushigi no Kachi Ari. Make ni Fushigi no Make Nashi
Wielder of the Ferro-Carbide Bat of Doom™®©

Takiro

  • Moderator
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,193
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: Quicksilver Decisions
« Reply #50 on: July 23, 2014, 06:14:21 AM »
Well we are all over the place with this decision but I am really liking JP's suggestion the best thus far.
Logged

JPArbiter

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,725
  • Host of Arbitration. Your last word in Battletech
Re: Quicksilver Decisions
« Reply #51 on: July 23, 2014, 10:32:19 AM »
For the Woodsman we would have to have a seperate contest of "Create some Configurations"

and don't get me wrong, I adore the Woody, and to a lesser extent the Lupus.  but by 3052 both machiens had been well aged out.
Logged
BattleTech products aren't Pokemon Cards. You don't have to catch, or collect them all.

WHAT NO ONE EVER TOLD ME THAT!

Abele

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,093
  • A Man in a Tin Suit
Re: Quicksilver Decisions
« Reply #52 on: July 23, 2014, 11:19:28 AM »
I'd go with JP's idea of including the Woodsman and Lupus as entrants.
Logged
The Honor of Men cannot be bound by the words of Fools- Marco Hietala
I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. - Confucius
May God defend me from my friends; I can defend myself from my enemies. - Voltaire
Chaos doesn't need a recipe, just a list of ingredients. - Drakensis
Kachi ni Fushigi no Kachi Ari. Make ni Fushigi no Make Nashi
Wielder of the Ferro-Carbide Bat of Doom™®©

masterarminas

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,515
Re: Quicksilver Decisions
« Reply #53 on: August 22, 2014, 11:59:40 PM »
Looking ahead to the 80-tonners . . . we have the Gargoyle and the Naga.  Both moving at 5/8/0, the top of the speed available for this weight (exclusive of MASC, of course). 

My question is . . . are you going to consider the Gargoyle a Speedster or an Assailant?  OR, will we be competing to replace the Gargoyle (as the Naga is super-specialized around being an artillery unit, and should be side-lined because of that) . . . meaning that we could have a TRIFECTA (!!) weight slot?

MA

Logged

Takiro

  • Moderator
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,193
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: Quicksilver Decisions
« Reply #54 on: August 23, 2014, 12:11:41 AM »
While a generally like to wait till a challenge comes up (we will start assaults after the next challenge) I will tell you that the Naga is being considered a limited production design because of its specialized nature and as such only the Gargoyle occupies a slot in the Quicksilver production lines. Since it is the fastest possible design of the 80 ton chassis I'll let you guys guess for now what is up for grabs. Just an EXACTA my friend, sorry! ;)
Logged

Bradshaw

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Expect it most when you expect it least
Re: Quicksilver Decisions
« Reply #55 on: June 05, 2018, 09:59:52 AM »
Instead of creating a new thread asking this question I found this one that was closest to what I wanted to ask.

Do you have a list of all the mechs that won the Quicksilver challenges? I was trying to piecemeal a list together but it got old fast.
Logged
NEVER trust a man who scratches his chin
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »