OBT Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OurBattleTech.com - A BattleTech Fan Site

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Known Dreadnought Warships of the 24th Century  (Read 24766 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

masterarminas

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,515
Re: Known Dreadnought Warships of the 24th Century
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2014, 11:41:23 PM »

Irose, I think that Takiro's and Drakensis' skepticism is because you made a typo in several of your posts:  I do believe you meant to say "FS and TC", but instead you typed "FS and TH".  I.e., implying that the Federated Suns and Terran Hegemony (not the Taurian Concordat) were engaged in that little kerfuffle around Robsart.

Easy enough to do, and frankly since I knew what you were referring to I missed on the first (and second) reads myself.

MA
« Last Edit: January 21, 2014, 11:43:20 PM by masterarminas »
Logged

Takiro

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,175
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: Known Dreadnought Warships of the 24th Century
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2014, 11:55:30 PM »

It is kind of hard to believe that the first true warship on warship action came 68 years after the launch of the Dreadnought but Robsart is the first major engagement it seems. 

I was merely speaking of other possible scenarios besides the Davion v Taurian battle of Robsart. A Terran on Terran fight could conceivable happened or since the Suns are next to deploy a warship there could have been a border incident. 

I am merely building the foundation for all to see CJvR. I think you'll realize by the time of the Succession War the House Navies should be on their fifth generation fleet which should relegate Terran castoffs to lesser duties than they have assumed in the canon Field Reports.
Logged

drakensis

  • Duke of Avalon
  • KU Player
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,299
Re: Known Dreadnought Warships of the 24th Century
« Reply #17 on: January 22, 2014, 02:27:53 AM »

Blacknova's correct that I read TH and presumed that you meant the Hegemony.

However I also presumed that you meant the years before that conflict, so two mistakes for the price of one.

In any event, the line between ships like the Dreadnought and armed starships (as I refer to pre-civilian core ships) isn't necessarily as obvious as it seems to us. They were larger and with more formidable weapons than those used before, but this seems to have been a difference of degree not kind in contemporary eyes.

After all, a considerable portion of the 300-strong HAF Navy in the 2330s would presumably have been early corvettes and the like not much larger than armed-equivalents of the Aquila class. Since small states like Liao could field very large fleets of the latter (Elias Liao had a fleet of 1,000 starships IIRC), the major warships were presumably capable of being fought, if not on even terms then at least by outnumbering them. Clashes like this probably characterised the early expansion of the Terran Hegemony: modest numbers Dreadnought and Dart class ships acting as command ships and fire support to squadrons of smaller combatants not notably better than those of their enemies.
Logged

lrose

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,664
Re: Known Dreadnought Warships of the 24th Century
« Reply #18 on: January 22, 2014, 10:18:10 AM »

In any event, the line between ships like the Dreadnought and armed starships (as I refer to pre-civilian core ships) isn't necessarily as obvious as it seems to us. They were larger and with more formidable weapons than those used before, but this seems to have been a difference of degree not kind in contemporary eyes.

If you look at the real world, the difference between a Dreadnought and a pre-dreadnought was the armament and the engines.  You could apply this to BT- prior to the introduction of the Dreadnought class, "warships" were armed with a mix of weapons (probably many no-capital weapons) while modern ships were armed with a more logical/efficient mix of weapons.  Most of the ships we know about mount 1-3 types of capital weapons-  Black Lion I (NAC/20, Killer Whales), Cruiser Cruiser (NAC/10, Barracuda, White Shark), Vigilant (NAC/10, White Shark), Bonaventure (NL35) and Dreadnought(NAC/10, NAC/20).  This fits with the idea of the original Dreadnought and it's all big gun armament.  Of the pre-2330 designs the only one with a huge mix of capital weapons is the Dart. 

Another difference between the Pre-dreadnougth and Dreadnoughts is probably the engines.  The earlier ships being merchant vessels probably had a thrust of 1/2 (as seen on the Aquilla which as the text indicates was used a warship at various points in its history).  Dreadnoughts were probably the first vessels designed to achieve over 2Gs acceleration (Again the Dart and Cruiser don't reach this level but are still able to achieve 1.5Gs- and it is worth noting many early real world dreadnoughts (Such as the US South Carolina Class) lacked the steam turbines of the Dreadnought and were therefore slower)

The last difference is probably the armor-Dreadnoughts used modern armor, while earlier ships probably used primitive armor. 

That said, even with the TH ships we can see some that don't fully fit the definition of a Dreadnought (Cruiser class and Dart).
Logged

CJvR

  • Fanjunkare
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 267
Re: Known Dreadnought Warships of the 24th Century
« Reply #19 on: January 22, 2014, 12:21:06 PM »

It is a shame that the regs weren't adjusted a bit when the new rulebooks were released. It would have been easy to build in some obsolescence in older designs, add a % or two to the drives of older designs then there would be no need to leave vast tonnage unused to make inferior older designs.
Logged

lrose

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,664
Re: Known Dreadnought Warships of the 24th Century
« Reply #20 on: January 22, 2014, 04:47:27 PM »

Just found this tidbit in Jihad Hot Spots Terra p. 148.  By 2335 the TH had built at least 300 warships- and probably had built a lot more.  The 300 number refers to the number assigned to Konrad McKenna during the 3rd Persuasion Campaign, presumably there were more that were used to defend the TH and it's worlds from possible aggression. 

P. 151 confirms that the TH saw little action against it's neighbors- The Age of War is said to have barely reached the TH, there were some raids by the DC, CC and FWL, but the attack on Terra Firma in 2409 was the first notable action against the TH. 
Logged

Takiro

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,175
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: Known Dreadnought Warships of the 24th Century
« Reply #21 on: January 22, 2014, 10:24:14 PM »

Warship class & Designation (Mass) - Faction (Sourcebook) - Year Introduced
Dreadnought class Battleship (960k tons) - Terran Hegemony (H:RW) - 2300
Dart class Light Cruiser (680k tons) - Terran Hegemony (TRO3057R) - 2305
Black Lion I class Battlecruiser (720k tons) - Terran Hegemony (FR CCAF 2765) - 2315
Bonaventure class Corvette (240k tons) - Terran Hegemony (TRO3057R) - 2317
Vigilant class Corvette (140k tons) - Terran Hegemony (TRO3057R) - 2320
Cruiser class Cruiser (500k tons) - Terran Hegemony (FR DCMS) - 2325

Incidentally I also believe there are more Terran warship classes in the 24th century which have yet to be detailed. For example the infamous collision between the warships Wildcat and Yalu could indicate another class not yet seen. Could there be a Destroyer introduced in 2310 which was flawed in some way? SLSB page 13 and Explorer Corps page 31 note McKenna’s dissatisfaction with the government because of the poor navigation in this incident. To me it even implied this incident could have been the impetus for his move against the corrupt Alliance. Was the design of this first Destroyer mangled in some way by the Alliance bureaucracy that led to a tragedy that began its downfall?

So if you include a Destroyer class warship which very well could be the Essex Block I you'd have 7 classes to divide that 300 around (which is a 10 warship a year average that obviously picked up). Only 7 Dreadnoughts were ever made according to its fluff and they are likely the flagships of their respective fleets. So based on their age and imagined fleet breakdown how would you envision the Terran Navy at this time?

There would be more Black Lions then Dreadnoughts but likely built at a slow pace. If we say one a year that is roughly 15 Battlecruisers by the time of this statement.
The Dart meant for independent operations could be built quite generously and was around for 25 years at the time of this statement. 2 a year for them would equal 50. Would the Hegemony continue building them?
The Cruiser to me is a new supplemental ship that could be built quite rapidly giving you between 5 and 10 ships.

That is roughly 220 ships short of the 300 number by 2330. Could mean a great number of Essex class Destroyers or possible other Destroyers. And how realistically fast could you manufacture Bonaventure and Vigilant class Corvettes? 3 a year each gives you almost 70 by 2330 but that is 150 Destroyers?! If you started in 2310 with the Destroyer number as I suggest that is 40 (2 per year made), 60 (3 per year made), or 80 (4 per year made). That is still 70 ships short. You really can't have a Transport yet because modern Docking Collars aren't established. Perhaps a Carrier of some type? But still not 70 ships worth. If you up the Bonaventure and Vigilant class Corvettes to 4 per year that would be a little over a hundred Corvettes and give you a 30 ship margin which isn't bad.
If you boost the Dart to three per year, which is enough Cruisers for me thanks, that gives you 75.

So to conclude my thinking out loud and please let me know if you agree that is -
7 Dreadnought class Battleships
20 Black Lion I class Battlecruisers (could be more here lets boost the original to say 18-20 total)
75 Dart class Cruisers (could be more here closing the margin, 60-70 total)
10 Cruiser class Cruisers (not gonna go overboard with 2 a year a good pace)
80 Essex I class Destroyers (which is 4 made a year which is impressive and somewhat questionable with early nav errors)
60 Bonaventure class Corvettes (four per year pace has got to slow you'd think but justified with Campaigns of Persuasion)
40 Vigilant class Corvettes (same thoughts for the Bonventure and they are buddy system warships)

292 total with another 5 Cruisers (3 per year made) or some other unknown class (8) makes for a pretty interesting 300 warship Navy. Especially when no one else fields anything but Pre-Dreadnoughts and Sleeper Missiles/Mines (Symra Incident) at this time. Guess I could see why Konrad McKenna got so over confident.  ;)
Logged

lrose

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,664
Re: Known Dreadnought Warships of the 24th Century
« Reply #22 on: January 22, 2014, 10:45:27 PM »

When looking at production we know that the TA built 20 "lesser" warships between 2300 and 2314 to escort the Dreadnoughts. Right now the only canon ship from that period besides the Dreadnought is the Dart- which means that they could have built the Dart at a rate of slightly more then 2 ships a year.  That rate would obviously go down if more ships are introduced from that time period. 

Also I think you may be too conservative on your production rates.  Jihad Hot Spots Terra (p. 148) has an interesting note about the rate of Warship production by the TH.  The implication is that the TH had a massive production capacity.  And as I note- the 300 ships should be considered a minimum- it is likely there were more that that. 

As for your numbers I think you are low on the number of Vigilants and Bonaventures- I think they were probably the most common classes in 2335. 
Logged

Takiro

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,175
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: Known Dreadnought Warships of the 24th Century
« Reply #23 on: January 23, 2014, 11:27:03 AM »

Well the Vigilant and Bonaventure are small but as of 2330 they were only in production for ten and thirteen years respectively. Building more than 4 of these Corvettes each (8 a year) is pretty damn good. How much higher would you go with an average level of production per year?

I just read up on the Campaigns of Persuasion again and the first conflict lasted from March 2316 to 2317. The Second Campaign of Persuasion began in 2320 and its hard to say when it end but the third wave lasted from 2335 to 2339. So obviously a naval buildup would help facilitate such conquests and help intimidate other worlds into the fold. As these Campaigns had the effect of spooking other worlds into defensive alliance against Terran subjugation such warship construction could have also been aimed against them. However these new states are distant threats unable to really threaten Terran nation building right away so that would a secondary concern.

Irregardless the Hegemony would want to gear up shipbuilding at this time certainly. How much they could? Well thats the question.
Logged

lrose

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,664
Re: Known Dreadnought Warships of the 24th Century
« Reply #24 on: January 23, 2014, 11:44:07 PM »

Well the Vigilant and Bonaventure are small but as of 2330 they were only in production for ten and thirteen years respectively. Building more than 4 of these Corvettes each (8 a year) is pretty damn good. How much higher would you go with an average level of production per year?

The TH/SLDF has seen some very high rates of production-  The Quixote built 250 ships in probably 50-75 years.  The Dart was probably built at a rate of 2+ per year.  I can easily see the TH building dozens of Vigilants or Bonaventures in a year.  These are small ships, the Vigilant is not much larger then a Aquilla and there were massive commercial fleets- Liao had 1000 ships.  So the production capability is there.  And again look at Jihad Hot Spots Terra P. 148 - there is specific mention of the sheer ship building capacity of the TH- no specific mentions but I think we are supposed to take from it that the TH's capacity was far beyond anything we see in 3050. 



Quote

Irregardless the Hegemony would want to gear up shipbuilding at this time certainly. How much they could? Well thats the question.

I think Terra had the capacity- they didn't need to gear up, rather they needed to switch from civilian production to military production.  In the real world this used to be fairly common.  Before WW2 it was common for private companies (such as Newport News Shipbuilding or Bath Iron Works) to build a mix of commerical and military vessels.  In fact many of these shipyards depended on commercial ships to tide them over when military contracts were scarce.  During WW2, when there was a need for large numbers of warships, these shipyards focused on warships.  I can see the same thing happening in the TH. 
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up