OBT Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OurBattleTech.com - A BattleTech Fan Site

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Tomahawk  (Read 1444 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ATN082268

  • Kavallerist
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 128
Tomahawk
« on: May 30, 2013, 09:16:43 PM »

  Going for cheap, easy to maintain but still a threat :)


BattleTech Vehicle Technical Readout
                      VALIDATED

Type/Model:    Tomahawk
Tech:          Inner Sphere / 2750
Config:        Tracked Vehicle
Rules:         Level 1, Custom design

Mass:          90 tons
Power Plant:   270 I.C.E.
Cruise Speed:  32.4 km/h
Maximum Speed: 54.0 km/h
Armor Type:    Standard

Armament:     
  1 LRM 20
  1 SRM 6
  4 Machine Guns

Manufacturer:  (Unknown)
  Location:    (Unknown)
Communications System:  (Unknown)
Targeting & Tracking System:  (Unknown)

--------------------------------------------------------
Type/Model:    Tomahawk
Mass:          90 tons

Equipment:                                 Items    Mass
Int. Struct.:  45 pts Standard               0      9.00
Engine:        270 I.C.E.                    0     29.00
    Cruise MP:   3
     Flank MP:   5
Heat Sinks:      0 Single                    0       .00
Cockpit & Controls:                          0      4.50
Crew: 6 Members                              0       .00
Turret Equipment:                            0      1.50
Armor Factor:  392 pts Standard              0     24.50

                          Internal    Armor
                          Structure   Value
   Front:                     9        102
   Left / Right Sides:        9      75/75
   Rear:                      9         70
   Turret:                    9         70

Weapons and Equipment    Loc  Heat  Ammo   Items    Mass
--------------------------------------------------------
1 LRM 20                 Turret   0   30     2     15.00
1 SRM 6                  Turret   0   15     2      4.00
1 Machine Gun            Front    0          1       .50
1 Machine Gun            Left     0          1       .50
1 Machine Gun            Right    0          1       .50
1 Machine Gun            Rear     0  100     2      1.00
--------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS:                           0          9     90.00
Items & Tons Left:                          14       .00

Calculated Factors:
Total Cost:        2,508,000 C-Bills
Battle Value:      780
Cost per BV:       3,215.38
Weapon Value:      850 / 850 (Ratio = 1.09 / 1.09)
Damage Factors:    SRDmg = 16;  MRDmg = 10;  LRDmg = 5
BattleForce2:      MP: 3,  Armor/Structure: 0 / 15
                   Damage PB/M/L: 2/2/1,  Overheat: 0
                   Class: GA;  Point Value: 8
                   Specials: if
Logged

JPArbiter

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,725
  • Host of Arbitration. Your last word in Battletech
Re: Tomahawk
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2013, 10:18:47 AM »

gotta be honest, for what it brings to the table, I will just buy Hunters if I want an LRM 20 Platform, or Strikers if I want a multi role platform.  sure they lack the anti infantry defense, but they are smaller, faster, demand less crew, and are cheaper to boot.

Plus when I hear Tomahawk, I think of something fast but hard hitting.  an heavy support vehicle does not fill that perception.

just my opinions though.  keep hitting the design software.
« Last Edit: May 31, 2013, 10:20:05 AM by JPArbiter »
Logged
BattleTech products aren't Pokemon Cards. You don't have to catch, or collect them all.

WHAT NO ONE EVER TOLD ME THAT!

ATN082268

  • Kavallerist
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 128
Re: Tomahawk
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2013, 09:01:37 AM »

gotta be honest, for what it brings to the table, I will just buy Hunters if I want an LRM 20 Platform, or Strikers if I want a multi role platform.  sure they lack the anti infantry defense, but they are smaller, faster, demand less crew, and are cheaper to boot.

Plus when I hear Tomahawk, I think of something fast but hard hitting.  an heavy support vehicle does not fill that perception.

just my opinions though.  keep hitting the design software.

  Thanks. Besides being cheap and easy to maintain, I was also going for endurance instead of more firepower. It should have enough ammunition and armor for roughly 2-3 battles, even on the modern battlefield with all those Gauss Rifles and such floating around :)
« Last Edit: June 01, 2013, 09:02:17 AM by ATN082268 »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up