OBT Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OurBattleTech.com - A BattleTech Fan Site

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: How do the 80-ton Assault Mechs differ?  (Read 10185 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Takiro

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,148
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: How do the 80-ton Assault Mechs differ?
« Reply #15 on: July 31, 2021, 05:34:49 PM »

Ugh, I know! So fatalistic. We finally get to the big boyz of the universe which I've been looking forward to since the start of the whole Optimization Contests (some 45 challenges ago) and many designers are so glum. Your about to play with the most tonnage around for weapons and armor. Sure maybe they aren't the fastest war machines around but Lyrans sure think they are the best! Don't get me wrong there are some big obstacles that come with all of this weight of responsibility but that is part of the fun to me.
Logged

Bradshaw

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Expect it most when you expect it least
Re: How do the 80-ton Assault Mechs differ?
« Reply #16 on: July 31, 2021, 06:15:47 PM »

Meant in the 55 to 75 ton ranges. I have a one or two for the 80 ton range And one each for next ton categories. But I feel a lot of similarities will be seen from us all.
Logged
NEVER trust a man who scratches his chin

fabulousorcboy

  • Fanjunkare
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 226
Re: How do the 80-ton Assault Mechs differ?
« Reply #17 on: July 31, 2021, 08:05:46 PM »

Quote
TAKIRO: Your about to play with the most tonnage around for weapons and armor. Sure maybe they aren't the fastest war machines around but Lyrans sure think they are the best!

But most of that weight is an illusion.

For an 80-ton 'Mech, if you set it at 3/5 with a 240 standard engine, and max the armor, that gives you 39 tons, which is a lot, but many weapons systems aren't viable on a 3/5 'Mech.  For example, you wouldn't make the thing a medium laser vomit build, because that's stupid.  And you can't be a small laser/machinegun or SRM backstabber.  You're dependent on ACs, large lasers, PPCs, LRMs, and Gauss Rifles, so your build options are going to be pretty limited.

For an 80-ton 'Mech, if you set it at 4/6 with a 320 standard engine, and max the armor, that gives you just 27 tons.  That gives you only slightly more weight than...a 50t centurion moving at 4/6.  Yes, you have more armor, but the weapons load-out is that of a medium or older (non-XL, 4/6 speed) heavy.  And your weapons selections are still pretty limited.

If you use an Inner Sphere XL engine, you're making your assault 'Mech an easy side torso kill.  We'll still design a few of those here, I'm sure, but still.  And if you don't max the armor, you're again making your assault 'Mech an easy kill.  So the design requirements eat up a large chunk of the weight, the low speed limits the weapons systems that are viable.

The Lyrans pre-Clans used lots of Assaults because (in canon) they have more money than sense, and they relied on lots and lots of armor to out-attrition the opponent.  But a "Lyran Scout Lance" is not an object of fear or respect, it's a joke about wasted resources.  Don't get me wrong, I love me some assault 'Mechs, and threw together some ideas already.... but until we're using Clan technology or light engines, the sorts of 'Mechs you can design with 3053 level 2 tech is going to end up with lots of very "samey" designs.

For example, I created over a dozen Marauder/Orion 75t variants, and about two dozen Warhammer/Archer/Grasshopper 70t variants.  But I can't come up with a lot of distinctive 80t variants that (a) are really distinct, (b) are 3053 level-2 technology, and (c) haven't already been created in canon.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2021, 08:33:11 PM by fabulousorcboy »
Logged

Takiro

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,148
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: How do the 80-ton Assault Mechs differ?
« Reply #18 on: July 31, 2021, 08:48:35 PM »

If you use an Inner Sphere XL engine, you're making your assault 'Mech an easy side torso kill.  We'll still design a few of those here, I'm sure, but still.  And if you don't max the armor, you're again making your assault 'Mech an easy kill.  So the design requirements eat up a large chunk of the weight, the low speed limits the weapons systems that are viable.

I think this is the big question of these contests now. To XL or not to XL? EndoSteel if available gives you a pretty good return on weight in comparison to all but the largest XL Engines. 14 criticals to 6 but you won't auto shutdown.

I was thinking about imposing some speed floors or ceilings on the 80 tonners cause that is where they are most different IMO but the Awesome for example is an energy boat (some times armed with missiles) which is usually slow 3/5 or 4/6 but call me crazy I could see a 5/8 (400XL) entry which tries to go all in on lasers to create a fast striking brawler. That way you can do 16 Double Heat Sinks without missing a beat or spending criticals. Personally I love the 9Q and that one which could be advanced will be tough for anyone to beat but hey that is why we have the contests.

The Charger I see as the speed demon of the 80s with a minimum speed of 4/6 being considered by me although I believe it was Ice who made a nasty AC/20 variant that was at that minimum. Let me say also a good story like Ice Hellion did on the Charger could see the Capellans who are in search of an Assault Mech turn to something in this direction.

The Goliath will probably benefit the most from these challenges because folks will be able to create true Quads.

The Victor is mobile with jump jets sometimes and is the soldier Assault Mech perhaps being the most available.

The Zeus (which seldom has an ER PPC, WTF?) has a little bit of everything weaponry wise and isn't all that fast.

I know I have an Atlas variant I am anxious to get out there but that is down the road.  ;)

And lastly I will suggest again work together on concepts, I encourage it. If you feel that opportunities are limited then get together with another designer to bonus ideas off each other and make the most of your joint entries. I think you'd be much better off.
Logged

Ice Hellion

  • Protector of the Taurian Concordat
  • KU Player
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,473
  • Beware of the all-seeing eye: Ice Hellion
Re: How do the 80-ton Assault Mechs differ?
« Reply #19 on: August 08, 2021, 03:38:39 AM »

The Charger I see as the speed demon of the 80s with a minimum speed of 4/6 being considered by me although I believe it was Ice who made a nasty AC/20 variant that was at that minimum. Let me say also a good story like Ice Hellion did on the Charger could see the Capellans who are in search of an Assault Mech turn to something in this direction.

 ;D
Logged


"In turn they tested each Clan namesake
in trial against the Ice Hellion's mettle.
Each chased the Ice Hellion, hunting it down.
All failed to match the predator's speed and grace.
Khan Cage smiled and said, "And that is how we shall be."

The Remembrance (Clan Ice Hellion) Passage 5, Verse 3, Lines 1 - 5
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up