OBT Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OurBattleTech.com - A BattleTech Fan Site

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765  (Read 44825 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Takiro

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,175
  • For the Last Cameron!
Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« on: December 03, 2013, 06:48:57 PM »

Just wanted to throw this topic up now as I am downloading the second Field Report 2765 as I type. Be forewarned -






SPOILERS TO FOLLOW!!
Logged

Shadow_Wraith

  • Lojtnant
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 282
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2013, 07:09:44 PM »

Thanks for the notification! 
Logged

Dragon Cat

  • KU Player
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,271
  • Not Dead Until I Say So
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2013, 08:07:29 PM »

This is out!! Oooooo dear I need to go buy - back in a bit

EDIT

So the Combine had more ships than the Togura hidden in Mothball but they were as useless as the mothballed Carrier.

Being a WarShip thread here we go with the two ships in it:
The Narukami-class Destroyer looks pretty cool block I and block II shame about the technical problems

The Cruiser-class Cruiser... got to love committees.  I love the look of the ship.  For once instead of something that looks really sexy it's just plain and simple to the point "Beercan Battleship" or "Killer Space Keg" is what the class should have been called.  I'm not an expert on WarShips but if I was facing this particular one I'd want Anti-Missile Systems.

One thing I hadn't noticed was numbers of ships - 8 active fleets based around the Samarkand-class Carrier but no real numbers from my first run through
« Last Edit: December 03, 2013, 09:04:33 PM by Dragon Cat »
Logged
My stuff, and my AU timeline follow link and enjoy

http://www.ourbattletech.com/forum/dragon-cat-collection/

The original CBT thread
Dragon Cat on CBT


Really, as long as there is an unbroken line of people calling themselves "Clan Nova Cat," it doesn't really matter to me if they're still using Iron Wombs or not. They may be dead as a faction, but as a people they still exist. It's not uncommon in the real world, after all.

Takiro

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,175
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2013, 09:32:30 PM »

My first impressions I have to say are favorable especially when compared to CCAF 2765. Sword of Light formation is explained as is the Dieron Regulars and both are believable. A lot of Terran Hegemony focus which gives this product more of a then feel as opposed to CCAF. One oversight I will say is the lack of mention of the Luthien and Benjamin Shipyards which are known to exist also Midway would have been another shipyard candidate. I don't mind the strategy behind the DCA, small fast ships built around carriers, but the poor shipbuilding industry? Not sure I buy that completely although the Combine was never an industrial powerhouse. I just think some other canon established yards exist and they are overlooked to sell this maintenance hardship agenda. That being said I'm finding this one more palatable than CCAF. More later!
Logged

Dragon Cat

  • KU Player
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,271
  • Not Dead Until I Say So
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2013, 09:39:15 PM »

Last lines of the Morale section of the Admiralty I like

Quote
Despite their small size and lack of heavy WarShips, the DCA cannot be easily dismissed. If Takiro continues to expand the DCA at its current rate, SLIC estimates that within twenty years, the fleets will be three times their current size.
Logged
My stuff, and my AU timeline follow link and enjoy

http://www.ourbattletech.com/forum/dragon-cat-collection/

The original CBT thread
Dragon Cat on CBT


Really, as long as there is an unbroken line of people calling themselves "Clan Nova Cat," it doesn't really matter to me if they're still using Iron Wombs or not. They may be dead as a faction, but as a people they still exist. It's not uncommon in the real world, after all.

Knightmare

  • Terran Supremacist
  • Network Gnome
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,459
  • Taking out the Sphere's trash since 3026
    • Our BattleTech
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #5 on: December 03, 2013, 10:30:47 PM »

Other shipyards may not have been available as of 2765, but available by 2780.
Logged
Quote from: Dragon Cat
WORD (of Blake) is good for two things. 1. Leaving inappropriate notes on other people's work. 2. Adding fake words (of Blake) to the dictionary.

lrose

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,664
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2013, 05:33:56 AM »

So far having read most of the FR I only have 2 complaints (besides my usual grips about grammar/wording).  The first is the lack of a detailed fleet listing like in the CCAF report.  We can probably come up with a fairly accurate listing but it would be nice to have an official one. The second is the bit in the Narukami fluff that a few survivors were mothballed and survived to the 3060s.  What happened to LCAF Invincible being the last known warship in the IS between the 2nd SW and the 3050s?  This is not the first time this has happened in relation to the DC- 1 Samarkand was said to survive as a museum.  Sure they are in poor condition, sure no one during the 3rd SW really understands the technology involved but with the ships ability to make a huge difference on the battlefield why wouldn't the DC make an effort to return them to service?  Hell why wouldn't Comstar try to destroy them like they did the Tripitz? 
Logged

Takiro

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,175
  • For the Last Cameron!
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2013, 06:29:07 AM »

I like the whole feel of the Report thus far Dragon Cat. It really gives you the feel that the Draconis Combine is coming to eat your babies or at least that is what the SLDF thought at this time. Which they did. Beside the Periphery Rebellion everyone was expecting Kurita to attack the Hegemony not Amaris. So the whole mindset behind the book is pretty damn good. It gives you the 2765 feel that Liao missed.

Other shipyards may not have been available as of 2765, but available by 2780.

Granted. Much of the Dragon's planned economy I had originally envisioned had centralized its industry around capital worlds like Luthien and Benjamin. This seemed to be better reasoning to me rather than having their main shipyards at Schuyler and Chatham because they existed in 3025 and were already known. Its the one thing I see that gives the book a now not then feeling for the Combine. I would have inverted development with Chatham and Schuyler being created to grow the DCA fleet structure. And don't sleep on Midway - as it is the DCA HQ and home to the Aerospace Institute even though I haven't seen that yet.

I haven't put all the warship data together yet Irose but the lack of detail benefits the small fleet situation. It gives it a bigger feel than the CCAF report which lists every single ship. I do like what I see of the DCA so far but the fleets are still too damn small. While others may take solace in several hints that it may double or triple soon I do not. However it was done better than CCAF FR.

Mothballing of ships could be addressed by their breakdown prior to the Invincible and ComStar could have screwed with their long term maintenance cycles destroying or distressing key components effectively killing these relics and stopping them from ever terrorizing humanity again. It does take some of the luster off the Invincible I grant you but maybe people thought that the ship was still active somewhere and could still return better than these known wrecks.
Logged

lrose

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,664
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2013, 06:56:36 AM »

I haven't put all the warship data together yet Irose but the lack of detail benefits the small fleet situation. It gives it a bigger feel than the CCAF report which lists every single ship. I do like what I see of the DCA so far but the fleets are still too damn small. While others may take solace in several hints that it may double or triple soon I do not. However it was done better than CCAF FR.

I took a quick stab at it and figured the DC navy looks something like this
Explicitly Stated in the FR:
8 Samarkand
6 Narukami
2 vincents

Assumed from other sources
6 Aegis

My guesses:
6 Vincent
4 Lola I
2 Essex I
3 Baron
3 Carson
2 Cruiser (what a stupid name they couldn't have come up with something better)

Over half the fleet has to be Corvettes & Destroyers- meaning less then 22 ships are cruisers or larger. the Samarkands & Aegis account for 14 ships, I picked 2 Cruisers since that would give each fleet a cruiser to escort the Samarkand.  The rest of the ships are just a guess on my part- I could see numbers changing slightly - I could be easily convinced to increase the number of Vincents at the expense of some of the old HAF destroyers.  We know the DC had at least 1 Baron class destroyer it is mentioned in the fluff in TR3057R.

What I do like about the fleet is the lack of larger ships.  That is how we saw the Combine fleet in BTSD- largely smaller and faster.   I also like the effort to explain the lack of home designed warships The fluff also leaves open the possibility that there are more Combine designed ships - the write up specifically states that the Samarkand and Narukami are the only 2 Combine designed & build warships currently in service- so others may have been retired or mothballed. 
Logged

Ice Hellion

  • Protector of the Taurian Concordat
  • KU Player
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,481
  • Beware of the all-seeing eye: Ice Hellion
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2013, 01:55:30 PM »

My first impressions I have to say are favorable especially when compared to CCAF 2765. Sword of Light formation is explained

We might find the solution to our dilemma regarding these units.
Logged


"In turn they tested each Clan namesake
in trial against the Ice Hellion's mettle.
Each chased the Ice Hellion, hunting it down.
All failed to match the predator's speed and grace.
Khan Cage smiled and said, "And that is how we shall be."

The Remembrance (Clan Ice Hellion) Passage 5, Verse 3, Lines 1 - 5

Corsair_SG

  • Fanjunkare
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 225
  • CDT, just another arms industrie ;)
    • New Solaris - Home of the Sleeping Dogs!
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2013, 03:13:57 PM »

Can some one send me at least the stats for the ships so I can plug them into HMA to fool around with the numbers and try them out at a game this weekend ?
Logged
When in Doubt, Superior Firepower and Armor helps a lot.

FirstStarLord

  • Korporal
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 73
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2013, 10:10:52 PM »

I'm just going off of the preview up on DriveThruRPG (Forgive me, I just bought FM3145 and FR CC 2765 the other day, my budget is limited!), but I like the overall tone of the work. It fits in with the Combine military as we know it and serves as a good bridge between H: RW and the original House sourcebook. That said, I have a few nitpicks.


1) The general blandness of the DCMS in general. I guess this is a problem I've always had with House Kurita's regiments, even back in the day. The DCMS is defined by it's general philosophy rather than it's individual parts. You have the great mass of district regiments, the Sword of Light as the pinnacle, the Prosperpina Hussars as the mobile reserve, the Sun Zhang Cadres as training units, and the Arkab Legions as a unique subforce that provides an alternative to the 'samurai in giant robots'. Very conventional compared to the more colorful brigades of the other house armies. In 3025 and beyond you had some units that broke this mold (The Legion of Vega, Ryuken, Genyosha etc.) and give the Dracs some color, but I guess in this era there's no room for that... even with 114 regiments to flesh out. Is the Otomo even listed or are they not a full regiment?

2) The section on the training academies. No mention of An Ting Academy, I guess it was not formed for a few more years, so that leaves the usual suspects like Sun Zhang. Can't there have been at least one academy that existed exclusively in the Star League era? Sometimes it feels like the writers want to play it safe on the issues that have the most wiggle room. (And then retcon long-established canon with no warning. Looking at you planetary populations.)

3) Why define the size of the conventional and aerospace forces? They don't define it in the report on the Capellans, and who wants to bet that they won't on the other states? I remember that TPTB said at one point they were moving away from such things to prevent the setting from becoming too limited, but that concept is violated again, and not even in a consistent manner. You either get your writing staff to define these things for every faction or not at all. This problem goes back to FM: SLDF as well, but I'm not going to start getting into that one right now.

Overall I'm pleased with what I read despite my harsh words above, and getting this PDF will definitely be on my New Year's resolutions. Maybe by that time the AFFS report will be out too. I'd like to think this series will be finished by the end of spring at the latest so we can move on to the early Succession Wars material by late Summer or Fall. The size of the House Armies in 2785 is something worth spending at least a chapter or two of ink on.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2013, 10:11:13 PM by FirstStarLord »
Logged

Rainbow 6

  • KU Player
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,991
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #12 on: December 06, 2013, 02:32:25 PM »


Explicitly Stated in the FR:
8 Samarkand
6 Narukami
2 vincents

Assumed from other sources
6 Aegis

My guesses:
6 Vincent
4 Lola I
2 Essex I
3 Baron
3 Carson
2 Cruiser (what a stupid name they couldn't have come up with something better)
 

I'm guessing you meant to put 2 Vigilant Corvettes instead of 2 Vincents?

So each DCA Fleet is 1 Carrier, 1 Cruiser and 3 Escorts?

Not a bad set up, how do you think that fleet composition would work against a typical Capellan Fleet?
Logged

lrose

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,664
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2013, 08:13:30 PM »

Yeah I meant Vigilants, not Vincents.

Personally I think the DC fleets would be far superior to the Capellan ones.  The Capellan Fleets have 1 Du Shi Wang, 2 Cruisers (Soyal or Aegis) and 2-3 destroyers or Corvettes.  The DC fleet has a huge number of fighters- 72 from the Samarkand alone, while the CapCon ships have almost no defense against fighters. Yes the CC fleet can carry fighter transports, but then again so can the DC Fleet.  So I suspect in a 1 on 1 fight, the DC's fighters would shred the CapCon ships. 
Logged

lrose

  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,664
Re: Reviewing FR DCMS 2765
« Reply #14 on: December 07, 2013, 10:24:10 AM »


Granted. Much of the Dragon's planned economy I had originally envisioned had centralized its industry around capital worlds like Luthien and Benjamin. This seemed to be better reasoning to me rather than having their main shipyards at Schuyler and Chatham because they existed in 3025 and were already known. Its the one thing I see that gives the book a now not then feeling for the Combine. I would have inverted development with Chatham and Schuyler being created to grow the DCA fleet structure. And don't sleep on Midway - as it is the DCA HQ and home to the Aerospace Institute even though I haven't seen that yet.



I've thought about this some more and I think you hit the problem on the head.  The original Kurita book talks about the loss of the miles long Amalgamated Sword & Steel and massive DeHuego & Freschet dropships lines- they also talk about the massive Diplan facility that built the Jenner.  As a result I have always envisioned the DC have a few truly huge factories, unlike the LC or FWL which had tons of smaller factories spread across dozens, even hundreds of war. The result is that the DC would suffer severely if they lost even 1 or 2 of their massive factories. 

As to the shipyards- in the original House Steiner book it mentions that in 2787 the Tamar Tigers raided Luthien and destroyed the shipyards there.  Is it possible these shipyards were built after 2765- yes it is, but given the importance of Luthien it is more likely they have been there for centuries.   Just something we will have to consider in BTSD
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Up