OBT Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OurBattleTech.com - A BattleTech Fan Site

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine  (Read 31579 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CJvR

  • Fanjunkare
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 267
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #15 on: September 18, 2013, 08:31:29 AM »

Why isn't Principality of Rasalhague in the treaty? I would think that a small nation existing between the EVIL Empire and a "reformed", and alarmingly powerful, pirate gang would look for as many treaties and reassurances as they could get. Rasalhague seems to have done nothing but sit around waiting for the other waraji to drop.
Logged

panzerfaust150

  • Guest
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #16 on: September 18, 2013, 10:11:49 AM »

OOC: Folks, I am going to weigh in here. KM said that the treaty ended Aug 3031. Black has said to me in numerous communications the LCAF is sitting this one out and the AFFS is hitting the Combine (which is something in of itself that does not make sense if the LCAF is sitting it out). In short? If the treaty is expired, and it's all open season, then what's to prevent a 5th War?

Look at it from the position of the Allies. The DCMS just launched a major, and I mean major invasion of a neutral buffer state. They've forced Oberon to intervene. An Oberon that is tied through marriage to the LC and through alliance to the AFFS. In short, they crossed a line, and both powers have the means and will to do something about it.

Meanwhile, the FRAC has just entered into the Regulan War, and there's a good chance that they are going to run into League troops, and there will be fighting. This might just draw in the CC, just so she can grab as much of Oriente as possible. (It's what I would do if I were the CC), this then pulls the League in two directions. While the LC isn't obligated by the terms of it's treaty to intervene there, it does give it a free hand against the Combine.

In short, Isoroku Kurita has done a very, very stupid thing. Something likely to start a war, a big war.
Logged

panzerfaust150

  • Guest
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #17 on: September 18, 2013, 10:20:59 AM »

IC:
 Since Starlight Broadcasting has shown a reluctance to do the right thing here. I then propose the following. A trade embargo of the Combine, this would not apply to the Southern Court. Length of the embargo can be negotiated, but I think a two year embargo would work, don't you all?

  Katrina Steiner
Logged

Kwic

  • The Grimm Face of Oberon
  • KU Player
  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 172
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #18 on: September 18, 2013, 11:31:20 AM »

Why isn't Principality of Rasalhague in the treaty? I would think that a small nation existing between the EVIL Empire and a "reformed", and alarmingly powerful, pirate gang would look for as many treaties and reassurances as they could get. Rasalhague seems to have done nothing but sit around waiting for the other waraji to drop.

The treaty was between the DC LC FS and OC to end the conflict between those parties. PR was up until that time quite friendly with the DC considering their acceptance of PR independence. We all know how well that has gone for them now.

The PR was laying low trying to stay out of the way and being unnoticed.

Logged

CJvR

  • Fanjunkare
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 267
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #19 on: September 18, 2013, 11:45:40 AM »

Perhaps the LIC have screwed up and interpreted this as a possible opening to the Second Kapteyn war, and since the Lyrans have three possible frontiers waiting for developments might be sensible while the CC and FS are somewhat freer to act. It is not that long ago since the Skye revolt and the exiled rangers are still lurking. The LCAF might subsidize a few mercenary contracts as well as "volunteers and logistics support to the Oberons while preparing to back them up if the Dragon continues to advance.

Considering the Skye revolt, the generally cordial relations between Terra and Luthien (on the surface at least) and the delivery of an entire navy to the FLW just before the balloon goes up it is not an unreasonable assumption. In a second Kapteyn war the isolated LC would be a logical target prompting some caution.

Although I do tend to agree, the destruction of Rasalhague is a bit to big an event for the Lyrans to sit out even with a bit of proxy warfare through the Oberons.
Logged

Knightmare

  • Terran Supremacist
  • Network Gnome
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,459
  • Taking out the Sphere's trash since 3026
    • Our BattleTech
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #20 on: September 18, 2013, 01:22:21 PM »

The PR was laying low trying to stay out of the way and being unnoticed.

Their mistake.

In short, Isoroku Kurita has done a very, very stupid thing. Something likely to start a war, a big war.

[OOC — Of this, there is little doubt.

The League fighting Regulus—and FRAC's entrance—is tantamount to an internal squabble (akin to the Skye Rebellion within the Commonwealth) until it isn't. Should the Confederation enter the fray they do so because it's advantageous for them to authorize the attack. Whether or not that broadens the conflict is anyone's guess, but since Oriente is already a mess I don't really see their stepping in as an escalation, but rather a way to bring stability back to the region. Honestly, it all really depends on how the Capellans advance beyond their traditional border (former Hegemony worlds may be somewhat used to new flags flying overhead, but old-school League worlds may not take too kindly to Capellan culture being forced on them.)

As for the Combine...well, Isoroku has to solidify his control of the Combine. A limited war of territory to regain lost honor would be most effective—so they're doing it. The fact of the matter is that the Combine has not broached their agreement with the allied powers, and if Oberon, the LC and the FS just left it alone I'm sure this would fizzle our accordingly. Jumping the gun IMHO heightened tensions and brought the whole invasion to the interstellar stage.

While that doesn't help the very real possibility of the Combine starting a future war, it would certainly minimize the possibility of a major one breaking out now. The fact that the allied powers have gotten all uppity over the Rasalhague invasion is like the early mobilization phases of WWI. Once it began, it was real hard to stop the inevitable. It just seems like the allied powers are so convinced or worried about the Dragon's change in leadership that they're doing the very thing they shouldn't: antagonize Luthien at a time when it needs to blow off steam so it can remain manageable.

Rasalhague is meaningless except that it offers the DC a punching bag for its armed forces. The fact that it's a thin buffer between Oberon and the Commonwealth is meaningless.   

Keep in mind there is a young heir to throne in desperate need of help and support. Whether or not she makes it back to the throne is also irrelevant, it's still a golden opportunity to influence the next six decades of Combine relations—or to continue to weaken the Combine from within by fomenting internal conflict. Rather than draw armies and make a bigger mess, why not support Rasalhague and Omi with material to fight the Dragon. Then the problem(s) remain firmly within the Combine and away from everyone else?

Or better yet, want to really keep the Combine for having to make good on slights to it's honor? Don't give the Combine reason to do so. It may not stop a war, but it may prevent an unnecessary one from happening at this time...]
Logged
Quote from: Dragon Cat
WORD (of Blake) is good for two things. 1. Leaving inappropriate notes on other people's work. 2. Adding fake words (of Blake) to the dictionary.

panzerfaust150

  • Guest
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #21 on: September 18, 2013, 01:52:51 PM »

OOC- KM, Mel might do that, but Katrina won't on sheer principle. As for the WWI comparison, well, name a war in Battletech that wasn't? The trouble is twofold for the Commonwealth to support Omi's Southern Court. One, and I am sure the TH would love this, it would give political ammunition to Skye, even if the cause of Skye has been set back for at least 2-3 decades, and second, conspiring with traitors to the Dragon? Well, now isn't that going to offend the Dragon's honor as well?

As for the Combine's honor, the allies have seen how much that is worth, and really don't trust it at all. (April agreement?) Perhaps the Hegemony might improve relations with the LC, but you really see the Commonwealth and DC improving relations without settling matters on the battlefield at some point? Even Mel, who's going to be a far more mellow leader than Katrina, knows she has to settle matters with this new Combine leader at some point, or he's going to use the "blowing off steam" excuse to pull all kinds of crap.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 01:53:42 PM by panzerfaust150 »
Logged

Ice Hellion

  • Protector of the Taurian Concordat
  • KU Player
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,473
  • Beware of the all-seeing eye: Ice Hellion
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #22 on: September 18, 2013, 02:26:08 PM »

The Taurian Concordat supports the Federated Suns question as answering to it will help us understand who has the real power here.

David Gelfmann - Taurian representative
Logged


"In turn they tested each Clan namesake
in trial against the Ice Hellion's mettle.
Each chased the Ice Hellion, hunting it down.
All failed to match the predator's speed and grace.
Khan Cage smiled and said, "And that is how we shall be."

The Remembrance (Clan Ice Hellion) Passage 5, Verse 3, Lines 1 - 5

Knightmare

  • Terran Supremacist
  • Network Gnome
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,459
  • Taking out the Sphere's trash since 3026
    • Our BattleTech
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #23 on: September 18, 2013, 02:30:09 PM »

[OOC —

The trouble is twofold for the Commonwealth to support Omi's Southern Court. One, and I am sure the TH would love this, it would give political ammunition to Skye, even if the cause of Skye has been set back for at least 2-3 decades, and second, conspiring with traitors to the Dragon? Well, now isn't that going to offend the Dragon's honor as well?

Personally, I don't see the Hegemony making much of a fuss over the LC or anyone supporting Omi. It is a case of apples and oranges—quite honestly—in comparison to Skye, and one the Hegemony probably supports. Keep in mind that each nation is its own distinct entity and approached differently. So Terra selling arms to Skye separatists and supporting Omi might create domestic problems for said nation, but achieve very different ends in very different years. The same could be said if the Commonwealth did the same...the "enemy of my enemy"....etc. Either way, it's the Commonwealth responding to specific players and a specific set of unique circumstances. 

That said, it's important to keep in mind that the Combine is very much split down the middle ideologically when it comes to the change in leadership and the reform roll back. While the bulk of the DCMS is supporting Isokuru—for a variety of reasons not limited to personal loyalty—there is a large portion of the Combine that supports Omi.

At this moment, there is a civil war being fought for the hearts and minds of the Combine's people. Supporting Omi can only help her side "win." Drawing the Combine into a major fight so the opposition can rally around fighting the gaijin only weakens Omi's position by giving the Combine an external enemy to focus on AFTER exhausting what they can get out of Rasalhague.

Remember, Omi's only a traitor if she loses the war for the Combine's soul.

At this point, it's far more dangerous in the long term to keep a guy like Isokuru on the throne—who's really Takashi 2.0—than investing in Omi and receiving the dividends for doing so.

Having the Combine focus in and on itself is far better than having the Combine focus its attentions elsewhere. A domestically troubled Combine is a weak Combine.   

As for the Combine's honor, the allies have seen how much that is worth, and really don't trust it at all. (April agreement?) Perhaps the Hegemony might improve relations with the LC, but you really see the Commonwealth and DC improving relations without settling matters on the battlefield at some point? Even Mel, who's going to be a far more mellow leader than Katrina, knows she has to settle matters with this new Combine leader at some point, or he's going to use the "blowing off steam" excuse to pull all kinds of crap.

There's a huge difference when it comes to honoring gaijin and the honor the Combine people bestow and exercise among themselves. At the end of the day does it really matter if Commonwealth-Combine relations or FedSuns-Combine, or even Hegemony-Combine relations improve if the Dragon is too busy fighting itself to fight you? Not really.

Don't want to deal with Isokuru AND the DCMS? Support Omi's rebellion. At the very least, she's a useful proxy to keep Isokuru occupied by allowing him and his supporters to "blow off steam" internally rather than against the LCAF, AFFS or HAF.

IMHO, that's a much better play than going to war with the Dragon at this stage. This is a crucial moment in Combine history, if the Black Dragons manage to burn themselves out in the Combine and Omi regains control of the country, her ascendance offers the unique opportunity to affect real change in Draconis Combine culture and interstellar relations for decades to come. She might be a kid now, but she won't be forever...]   
Logged
Quote from: Dragon Cat
WORD (of Blake) is good for two things. 1. Leaving inappropriate notes on other people's work. 2. Adding fake words (of Blake) to the dictionary.

CJvR

  • Fanjunkare
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 267
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #24 on: September 18, 2013, 02:44:09 PM »

Supporting Omi can only help her side "win."
Foreign support to a faction in a place as paranoid and xenophobic as the Combine is far more likely to be a kiss of death.
Logged

panzerfaust150

  • Guest
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #25 on: September 18, 2013, 03:03:06 PM »

IC:
 After consultation with our allies, and other associated powers. The Lyran Commonwealth puts forward an interdiction motion against the Combine on the basis of their indiscriminate use of warship bombardment against civilian targets, killing hundreds of thousands. These are clearly acts that are against the accepted laws of war in every realm in the Inner Sphere. They have gone so far as to leave the capitol city of Rasalhague a broken, unpopulated ruin, and have left millions injured and homeless.

 This action must not go unpunished, lords and ladies of the Inner Sphere, for it would set a bad precedent, one that would allow indiscriminate use of any and all weapons available against planetary targets without regards to civil populations. This was nothing more than a massacre, plain and simple, and any claim this is simply political belies the simple truth, the Draconis Combine slaughtered hundreds of thousands of people it claims are it's own citizens. As a nation that has recently dealt with it's own rebellion, I would proffer that this is no way to expect that this war will end with a Rasalhague willing to rejoin the Combine, but instead, one willing to kill Combine soldiers any way it can.

 There should be an interdiction on the basis of common accepted Interstellar Law. We should vote for on the basis of morality, as I expect noone here would condone the deliberate murder of hundreds of thousands of innocents. Even the TH has attempted to make amends for the "Skye incident," I see no such actions on the part of the Combine. None whatsoever.
Logged

Knightmare

  • Terran Supremacist
  • Network Gnome
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,459
  • Taking out the Sphere's trash since 3026
    • Our BattleTech
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #26 on: September 18, 2013, 03:59:15 PM »

There should be an interdiction on the basis of common accepted Interstellar Law. We should vote for on the basis of morality, as I expect none here would condone the deliberate murder of hundreds of thousands of innocents. Even the TH has attempted to make amends for the "Skye incident," I see no such actions on the part of the Combine. None whatsoever.

So the Commonwealth is suggesting we punish the Combine on the basis of a commonly accepted Interstellar Law? What commonly accepted INTERSTELLAR LAW are you referring to?

After consulting the history books, the only commonly—as in more than one participating nation—Interstellar Laws are the now-defunct Ares Conventions which your ancestors conveniently shredded at the start of the Succession Wars.   

So if you are referring to the Ares Conventions, would the Commonwealth also be referring to their violations of the Ares Conventions and the violations made by every Great House since the fall of the Star League? Violations that even now my country is struggling to repair? For that matter, how many Combine or League worlds still bear the scars of past Lyran bombardments, and how many Lyran worlds still bear theirs? Should we start referring to or punishing those violations now? The Hegemony is unaware of a statute of limitations on the orbital bombardment of civilian targets?   

If the Commonwealth is indeed referring to the Ares Conventions as said-commonly accepted interstellar laws then the Hegemony is prepared and ready to vote "Yes" for the interdiction of every nation that has violated the so-called "commonly accepted interstellar law."   

Now, if the Lyran Commonwealth is proposing that we—the nations of the Inner Sphere and Periphery—reinstate the Ares Conventions then we should pursue that topic, and other topics pertaining to their enforcement—such as interdiction. Then and only then will the Terran Hegemony support the rule of "Interstellar Law" and associated punishments for its infringement, as such law and enforcement will be available to this board. 

Until then, the Terran Hegemony sees no legal or moral basis for action against the Draconis Combine or any other sovereign nation for that matter at this time.





 
« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 04:01:38 PM by Knightmare »
Logged
Quote from: Dragon Cat
WORD (of Blake) is good for two things. 1. Leaving inappropriate notes on other people's work. 2. Adding fake words (of Blake) to the dictionary.

panzerfaust150

  • Guest
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #27 on: September 18, 2013, 04:12:10 PM »

<clap, clap> What a lovely straw man argument. I am referring to the precedent set by the Capellan Confederation in the wake of the Alcyone bombardment that has generally been agreed to by all warship owning states, unless of course, the Hegemony has no intention of agreeing to such a precedent?

And as for statutes of limitations, I would propose the doers of such actions you have discussed are long since dead, but since you want it, you got it. Let's bring the Ares Conventions back. The Commonwealth is more than willing to live by such an agreement, and if the Terran Hegemony has appointed itself the enforcement body, as it obviously has...then we see no issues. Congratulations, you just appointed yourself policeman of the Inner Sphere! <opens arms wide> I am sure we will all sleep well in our beds tonight knowing Officer Hamilton is on the beat! We'd just better pray he's in a good mood...he is a little light on the trigger, you know.
Logged

Knightmare

  • Terran Supremacist
  • Network Gnome
  • General
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,459
  • Taking out the Sphere's trash since 3026
    • Our BattleTech
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #28 on: September 18, 2013, 04:41:26 PM »

<clap, clap> What a lovely straw man argument. I am referring to the precedent set by the Capellan Confederation in the wake of the Alcyone bombardment that has generally been agreed to by all warship owning states, unless of course, the Hegemony has no intention of agreeing to such a precedent?

And as for statutes of limitations, I would propose the doers of such actions you have discussed are long since dead, but since you want it, you got it. Let's bring the Ares Conventions back. The Commonwealth is more than willing to live by such an agreement, and if the Terran Hegemony has appointed itself the enforcement body, as it obviously has...then we see no issues. Congratulations, you just appointed yourself policeman of the Inner Sphere! <opens arms wide> I am sure we will all sleep well in our beds tonight knowing Officer Hamilton is on the beat! We'd just better pray he's in a good mood...he is a little light on the trigger, you know.

Again, the Hegemony asks where this "precedent" has "generally been agreed to by all WarShip owning states?" If the Lyran Commonwealth can point the Hegemony to some document or accord agreed to by ALL WARSHIP OWNING STATES then the Terran people would be willing to utilize it as the foundation of a new set of interstellar laws to be discussed and perhaps accepted by all WarShip owning states.

Once again, it would seem the Commonwealth has missed the point of the Hegemony's earlier statement, which was to open the door to a discussion with the hopes of creating a cohesive and clear set of—to use the Commonwealth's words once again—"commonly accepted interstellar laws." Sadly, it seems the Commonwealth's vitriol extols exactly what the Hegemony has come to expect: The Commonwealth cries Terran conspiracy when they don't get their way.

Quote from: Knightmare
Now, if the Lyran Commonwealth is proposing that we—the nations of the Inner Sphere and Periphery—reinstate the Ares Conventions then we should pursue that topic, and other topics pertaining to their enforcement—such as interdiction. Then and only then will the Terran Hegemony support the rule of "Interstellar Law" and associated punishments for its infringement, as such law and enforcement will be available to this board

At no point did the Terran government suggest becoming the policeman of the Inner Sphere.

If anything, the Terran people applaud the Commonwealth for broaching the topic of commonly accepted interstellar law, but rightly pointed out that in the absence of one it would behoove "us"—the nations of the Human Sphere—to either revive or create a new one before anymore false allegations of violations occur. 

If the Commonwealth believes sarcasm and petty name calling is a suitable shield to hide their impotence at being "foiled again by those dastardly Terrans" by remaining the voice of fairness and reason, then the Hegemony understands your reluctance to revive the Ares Conventions or pave the way for their discussion.

As such, since the Lyran people seem more interested in their own needs than the needs of the Inner Sphere, the Terran Hegemony proposes opening a discussion to revive the Ares Conventions with the express purpose of enforcing them through this body and the punishment of Interdiction. 

« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 04:44:04 PM by Knightmare »
Logged
Quote from: Dragon Cat
WORD (of Blake) is good for two things. 1. Leaving inappropriate notes on other people's work. 2. Adding fake words (of Blake) to the dictionary.

panzerfaust150

  • Guest
Re: Interdiction of the Draconis Combine
« Reply #29 on: September 18, 2013, 04:48:17 PM »

Gee, the Terrans agree with us? This might actually be a red letter day. By the way. We don't say "dastardly Terrans." We just call you what you are. Bullies.

And nope, we are in no way reluctant to reopen the discussions about the Ares Conventions. You opened the door, pal, let's see if you can handle the responsibility. Somehow, I doubt it. But hey, you might surprise us. I admit you willingness to open talks with us was "reassuring." But the greatest navy in the Inner Sphere willing to put shackles on it's own behavior after some of what it has done in recent times? Hmm, I find that a positive development. Let's see if your actions match the words, Terran. By the way...we have nothing to lose from such an agreement, it would be nice to have a treaty that restrains Terran Warships from their "surgical strikes" that they up until recently, had a predilection for.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2013, 05:04:49 PM by panzerfaust150 »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up